Is it a bad idea to stop commenting function signatures relying on generative AI explanations instead

0 votes
With the help of code examples can you tell me Is it a bad idea to stop commenting function signatures, relying on generative AI explanations instead?
Feb 13, 2025 in Generative AI by Nidhi
• 16,260 points
547 views

No answer to this question. Be the first to respond.

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
0 votes

Relying solely on generative AI explanations instead of commenting function signatures can be risky, as AI-generated descriptions may be inconsistent, lack context, or be unavailable during development

Here is the code snippet you can refer to:

In the above code we are using the following points:

  • Explicit Documentation: The well-commented function clearly explains parameters, return values, and purpose.
  • Self-Sufficiency: Developers can understand function usage without relying on AI.
  • Prevents Misinterpretation: Avoids incorrect assumptions AI might make based on incomplete context.
  • Enhances Code Readability: Especially useful for team projects and future maintenance.
Hence, stopping function signature comments and relying solely on AI explanations is a bad idea, as it can reduce clarity, hinder offline development, and lead to misinterpretations—manual documentation remains crucial.
answered Feb 13, 2025 by ninu

edited Mar 6, 2025

Related Questions In Generative AI

0 votes
1 answer
webinar REGISTER FOR FREE WEBINAR X
REGISTER NOW
webinar_success Thank you for registering Join Edureka Meetup community for 100+ Free Webinars each month JOIN MEETUP GROUP