The challenges in implementing distributed rate limiting using Hazelcast are as follows:
Challenges:
- Consistency Issues: Ensuring consistent rate-limiting across nodes.
- Performance Overhead: High latency due to distributed locks or data replication.
- Fault Tolerance: Handling node failures without losing rate-limiting state.
Here are resolutions you can refer to:
- Use AtomicLong for counters with Hazelcast's distributed data structures.
- Apply bucket-based algorithms to reduce contention.
- Configure persistence or backups to handle node failures.
Here is the code you can refer to:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35978/35978797a77fd6300eb678c03d5013086676a3d8" alt=""
In the above code, we are using Hazelcast's IAtomicLong for atomic rate counters, Store request timestamps in a distributed map for cleanup, and Leverage Hazelcast's CP subsystem for consistency in partitioned environments.