Why use jQuery on instead of click

Question

Currently with jQuery when I need to do something when a Click occurs I will do it like this...

$(".close-box").click( function() {
    MoneyBox.closeBox();
    return false;
});

I was looking at some code someone else has on a project and they do it like this...

$(".close-box").live("click", function () {
    MoneyBox.closeBox();
    return false;
});

Notice it seems to do the same thing as far as I can tell except they are using the live() function which is now Deprecated and jQuery docs say to use on() instead but either way why use live/on() instead of my first example?

Answer 1

on() differs from . click() in that it has the ability to create delegated event handlers by passing a selector parameter, whereas . click() does not.

Because you might have a dynamically generated elements (for example coming from an AJAX call), you might want to have the same click handler that was previously bound to the same element selector, you then "delegate" the click event using on() with selector argument

on() can also be synonymous with click() if you don't have a selector specified:

$('.elementClass').click(function() { // code 
});

is synonymous with

$('.elementClass').on('click', function() { // code
});

In the sense that it only add the handler one time to all elements with class elementClass. If you have a new elementClass coming from, for example $('<div class="elementClass" />'), the handler won't be bound on that new element, you need to do:

$('#container').on('click', '.elementClass', function() { // code
});

Assuming #container is .elementClass's ancestor